The article “Centennial reprint: 1952 Supreme Court decision prompts College action on fee splitting,” on page 36 of the May 2013 Bulletin, contains an inaccuracy. The article should have stated, “The court maintained that because no public policy regarding these types of activities existed at the time that the physicians took the payments from the opticians, the court was forced to rule in the defendants’ favor.” The editors regret the error.
