Unsupported Browser
The American College of Surgeons website is not compatible with Internet Explorer 11, IE 11. For the best experience please update your browser.
Menu
Become a member and receive career-enhancing benefits

Our top priority is providing value to members. Your Member Services team is here to ensure you maximize your ACS member benefits, participate in College activities, and engage with your ACS colleagues. It's all here.

Become a Member
Become a member and receive career-enhancing benefits

Our top priority is providing value to members. Your Member Services team is here to ensure you maximize your ACS member benefits, participate in College activities, and engage with your ACS colleagues. It's all here.

Membership Benefits
ACS
Bulletin

Coming next month in JACS and online now: Creating individual surgeon performance assessments in a statewide hospital surgical quality improvement collaborative

A study suggests low surgeon-specific case volumes and minimal variance may limit the utility of ACS NSQIP outcomes measures for individual profiling.

ACS

August 1, 2018

Christopher M. Quinn, MS; Karl Y. Bilimoria, MD, MS, FACS; Jeanette W. Chung, PhD; Clifford Y. Ko, MD, MS, MSHS, FACS; Mark E. Cohen, PhD; and Jonah J. Stulberg, MD, PhD, MPH, FACS, report in the September issue of the Journal of the American College of Surgeons (JACS) that low surgeon-specific case volumes and minimal variance between surgeons may limit the utility of American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program outcomes measures for individual profiling. Alternative metrics, such as process measures, patient experience, composite measures, or technical skill assessments should be explored for surgeon-level measurement.

This article and all other JACS content is available online.